<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox 3 &#8211; Make Older Add-ons Work</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.palaestratraining.com/blog/2008/07/firefox-3-make-older-add-ons-to-work/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.palaestratraining.com/blog/2008/07/firefox-3-make-older-add-ons-to-work/</link>
	<description>Training You to Take on The World!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 14:28:20 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Using the Mozilla prism Extension with Firefox 3.5 &#171; Quantum Nudge</title>
		<link>http://www.palaestratraining.com/blog/2008/07/firefox-3-make-older-add-ons-to-work/comment-page-1/#comment-663</link>
		<dc:creator>Using the Mozilla prism Extension with Firefox 3.5 &#171; Quantum Nudge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 10:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.palaestratraining.com/blog/2008/07/firefox-3-make-older-add-ons-to-work/#comment-663</guid>
		<description>[...] are here: 1. Go to about:config 2. Right-click anywhere and create a new boolean. Name it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are here: 1. Go to about:config 2. Right-click anywhere and create a new boolean. Name it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaffas Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Gimme links</title>
		<link>http://www.palaestratraining.com/blog/2008/07/firefox-3-make-older-add-ons-to-work/comment-page-1/#comment-649</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaffas Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Gimme links</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 12:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.palaestratraining.com/blog/2008/07/firefox-3-make-older-add-ons-to-work/#comment-649</guid>
		<description>[...] Tweak your Firefox: http://www.palaestratraining.com/blog/2008/07/firefox-3-make-older-add-ons-to-work/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tweak your Firefox: <a href="http://www.palaestratraining.com/blog/2008/07/firefox-3-make-older-add-ons-to-work/" rel="nofollow">http://www.palaestratraining.com/blog/2008/07/firefox-3-make-older-add-ons-to-work/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lol</title>
		<link>http://www.palaestratraining.com/blog/2008/07/firefox-3-make-older-add-ons-to-work/comment-page-1/#comment-572</link>
		<dc:creator>lol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 03:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.palaestratraining.com/blog/2008/07/firefox-3-make-older-add-ons-to-work/#comment-572</guid>
		<description>does anyone know google chrome? then how do you get add ons there?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>does anyone know google chrome? then how do you get add ons there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lol</title>
		<link>http://www.palaestratraining.com/blog/2008/07/firefox-3-make-older-add-ons-to-work/comment-page-1/#comment-571</link>
		<dc:creator>lol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 03:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.palaestratraining.com/blog/2008/07/firefox-3-make-older-add-ons-to-work/#comment-571</guid>
		<description>Uh... I don&#039;t understand this strange stuff....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh&#8230; I don&#8217;t understand this strange stuff&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Threesformula</title>
		<link>http://www.palaestratraining.com/blog/2008/07/firefox-3-make-older-add-ons-to-work/comment-page-1/#comment-559</link>
		<dc:creator>Threesformula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 07:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.palaestratraining.com/blog/2008/07/firefox-3-make-older-add-ons-to-work/#comment-559</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t work for me. I have Firefox version 3.1 Beta 2 (3.1b2). Can someone please help?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t work for me. I have Firefox version 3.1 Beta 2 (3.1b2). Can someone please help?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DushUpsesyhek</title>
		<link>http://www.palaestratraining.com/blog/2008/07/firefox-3-make-older-add-ons-to-work/comment-page-1/#comment-536</link>
		<dc:creator>DushUpsesyhek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 00:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.palaestratraining.com/blog/2008/07/firefox-3-make-older-add-ons-to-work/#comment-536</guid>
		<description>Great web-site!!! You did an amazing job!!! I enjoyed watching the videos!!! You guys are great! 
Talking about ideas, there\s this really good show, which I like a lot, and I\m sure you\ve heared about it. It\s called STOMP. What these guys do is so cool, I saw them live in NY. I\m sure you can do the same and even better. It really turns people on. Just an idea, hope it could be any helpful. 
&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.beepworld.it/members/laceyduvalleinf&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;lacey duvalle&lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.beepworld.it/members/carattereits&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;carattere&lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.beepworld.it/members/vvlauittlz&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www laurax it&lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.beepworld.it/members/firenrisitz&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;firenze ristorante&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great web-site!!! You did an amazing job!!! I enjoyed watching the videos!!! You guys are great!<br />
Talking about ideas, there\s this really good show, which I like a lot, and I\m sure you\ve heared about it. It\s called STOMP. What these guys do is so cool, I saw them live in NY. I\m sure you can do the same and even better. It really turns people on. Just an idea, hope it could be any helpful.<br />
<a href='http://www.beepworld.it/members/laceyduvalleinf' rel="nofollow">lacey duvalle</a><br />
<a href='http://www.beepworld.it/members/carattereits' rel="nofollow">carattere</a><br />
<a href='http://www.beepworld.it/members/vvlauittlz' rel="nofollow">www laurax it</a><br />
<a href='http://www.beepworld.it/members/firenrisitz' rel="nofollow">firenze ristorante</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Rees</title>
		<link>http://www.palaestratraining.com/blog/2008/07/firefox-3-make-older-add-ons-to-work/comment-page-1/#comment-534</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Rees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 17:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.palaestratraining.com/blog/2008/07/firefox-3-make-older-add-ons-to-work/#comment-534</guid>
		<description>Back in the 70&#039;s everything was text-based green screen so there really wasn&#039;t a need for processing power aside from number crunching mathematical equations.  Computers really only do four things 1) accept input, 2) processing the input, 3) producing output, 4) storing the data.   So what we have these days are just prettier wrappers on the process, making it easier to use, more user-friendly, etc.  Graphics is the big killer, as they just keep increasing every year and the need for more powerful graphics cards escalates (pushed of course by the billion dollar gaming industry).

The reality of that though, is that if you&#039;re not into gaming, then it&#039;s really irrelevant as you have no need to keep up with the bleeding edge.  Now operating systems, that&#039;s a different story....   I would agree I can&#039;t see the reasons why each version of Windows gets increasingly fatter, seemingly slower, and requires more processing power.  Most of the fancy effects and features in Vista can be found in any linux distribution running desktop effects with 1/2 the hardware requirements (and they run beautifully), virtual desktops, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back in the 70&#8217;s everything was text-based green screen so there really wasn&#8217;t a need for processing power aside from number crunching mathematical equations.  Computers really only do four things 1) accept input, 2) processing the input, 3) producing output, 4) storing the data.   So what we have these days are just prettier wrappers on the process, making it easier to use, more user-friendly, etc.  Graphics is the big killer, as they just keep increasing every year and the need for more powerful graphics cards escalates (pushed of course by the billion dollar gaming industry).</p>
<p>The reality of that though, is that if you&#8217;re not into gaming, then it&#8217;s really irrelevant as you have no need to keep up with the bleeding edge.  Now operating systems, that&#8217;s a different story&#8230;.   I would agree I can&#8217;t see the reasons why each version of Windows gets increasingly fatter, seemingly slower, and requires more processing power.  Most of the fancy effects and features in Vista can be found in any linux distribution running desktop effects with 1/2 the hardware requirements (and they run beautifully), virtual desktops, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry</title>
		<link>http://www.palaestratraining.com/blog/2008/07/firefox-3-make-older-add-ons-to-work/comment-page-1/#comment-532</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 15:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.palaestratraining.com/blog/2008/07/firefox-3-make-older-add-ons-to-work/#comment-532</guid>
		<description>Firefox 2 is great.
Why change a good thing?

Firefox 3 sucks.
What a shame.

The end of a good era.

------------------

Another point.
Way back in the mid 70&#039;s I was doing pretty much everything we can do now with far far less memory and almost no processing power. Why? because the software of today is Total Trash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefox 2 is great.<br />
Why change a good thing?</p>
<p>Firefox 3 sucks.<br />
What a shame.</p>
<p>The end of a good era.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Another point.<br />
Way back in the mid 70&#8217;s I was doing pretty much everything we can do now with far far less memory and almost no processing power. Why? because the software of today is Total Trash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lvleph</title>
		<link>http://www.palaestratraining.com/blog/2008/07/firefox-3-make-older-add-ons-to-work/comment-page-1/#comment-526</link>
		<dc:creator>lvleph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 01:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.palaestratraining.com/blog/2008/07/firefox-3-make-older-add-ons-to-work/#comment-526</guid>
		<description>about:config
extensions.checkCompatibility
extensions.checkUpdateSecurity
should both be set to false and all will work even if really old.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>about:config<br />
extensions.checkCompatibility<br />
extensions.checkUpdateSecurity<br />
should both be set to false and all will work even if really old.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stradivarius</title>
		<link>http://www.palaestratraining.com/blog/2008/07/firefox-3-make-older-add-ons-to-work/comment-page-1/#comment-510</link>
		<dc:creator>Stradivarius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 08:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.palaestratraining.com/blog/2008/07/firefox-3-make-older-add-ons-to-work/#comment-510</guid>
		<description>Works with me. Nice one. Now I can do the same with some add ons who don´t work either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Works with me. Nice one. Now I can do the same with some add ons who don´t work either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.572 seconds -->
<!-- Cached page served by WP-Cache -->
